in reply to More Review Categories

A general software category might work. It should go without saying however that anything reviewed there should have a direct relation to Perl or a very common Perl task in some way or other. Editors is a good point; webserver daemons, database software for which Perl bindings exist or the likes might be other.

I'm not really partial to the idea of a column/article review category. Ovid's note was hardly a review (can you really review an article? what's next, reviewing the review? :-)), it was a meditation sparked by a particular set of arguments. I think you will find just about all other similar nodes are similar in spirit also.

I don't think there's that many categories that would make sense; a software review category sounds like definitely a good idea though.

Makeshifts last the longest.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: More Review Categories
by ninja-joe (Monk) on Jun 04, 2002 at 17:39 UTC
    I'd have to agree with you on the article thing. It was an offhand sort of idea.
    How would we get the software review thing in motion?
      You just wait for the gods to pick it up. Or not. :-)
      ____________

      Makeshifts last the longest.
        There should be at least a way to get a yes or no answer. I'd be content with a no answer just as long as I knew it was at least denied and I can stop checking on the node! heh