Not a bad idea, but don't we already have that effect in the reviews area? Somebody posts a review, and other people comment on it? I even see duplicate reviews, where somebody else decides to review a book or module that's already been covered. The combination of comments and multiple reviews provide us with a good method of finding out what is good to who - and why. I suspect that explicit review by committee would end up with a lot of:

"tye was dismayed by the quality of the references chapter. Juerd felt that the coverage of OO was very enlightening. webfiend asserted that the accompanying CD tasted tangy and made pretty lights in the microwave".

We can get the same message across without the awkwardness of "he said/she said" stuff.

Of course, it occurs to me that I've never written anything with other people, and it might not work like that at all. It's just a hunch.

"All you need is ignorance and confidence; then success is sure."-- Mark Twain