in reply to Re: Title Re: collapsing revisited
in thread Title Re: collapsing revisited
might even get the job done, although I haven't tried it enough. And then you put it through the collapse sub to put those Re:s together.s{(?<=Re:) \(\w+\)}{}g;
$& has its uses too, in this case it was the best way I could come up with. ;-)
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^3: Title Re: collapsing revisited
by tadman (Prior) on Jun 08, 2002 at 20:23 UTC | |
by Dog and Pony (Priest) on Jun 08, 2002 at 21:24 UTC | |
by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Jun 08, 2002 at 22:08 UTC | |
Re^3: Title Re: collapsing revisited
by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Jun 08, 2002 at 21:06 UTC |