in reply to RE: Abusive Negative Voting
in thread Abusive Negative Voting

Like I said, it's obvious that he did not look in the docs before he started posting.
I am merely trying to say that if you're going to vote it down for something like not
looking in the docs, then say that, and then vote down. I understand that voting down
is going to happen. I don't want to alienate new monks. I like the friendly atmosphere
that we have here and I would like to see it extended to everyone.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: RE: RE: Abusive Negative Voting
by KM (Priest) on Jun 09, 2000 at 17:52 UTC
    Live with it, learn from it, go on with your life. People know they can comment on posts, and will do so when they deem it is needed. Is this conversation going to come up every single week?? By the way, I am giving the start of this thread a --, because I am tired of these threads. Happy? I explained why I am giving it --.

    Cheers,
    KM

[reply]
      If you feel it important to vote down my node, so be it. I appreciate your telling me why. That is all I ask.
      By the way, I have voted your post explaining your negative vote ++.
      Take care.
[reply]
      ....And I've just voted yours --, not that I particularly disagree just that it maintains the dynamic tension ;-)
[reply]
        And I voted yours -- because you voted mine -- and don't disagree with it.

        Cheers,
        KM

[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion