in reply to New types of links

I don't care much about adding shortcuts in general, but I think there needs to be some consideration over where these links go, since they imply a sort of endorsement from perlmonks. While I think there are very few people who will object to the [cpan://] link, I do object to dictionary.com (I use m-w instead) for the following reasons:
  1. Allows l33t style spelling
  2. Really just takes a lot of other people's definitions, including those in the jargon file, which isn't how a dictionary is usually compiled
  3. Includes value judgements on subject matter
For an example, see this entry. If you don't consider that statement that software piracy is illegal and should be reported to <non-governmental agency> a value judgement, search for the term 'murder' or 'rape' and note the lack of a similar statement.

Non-perl related links should be carefully considered.

  • Comment on (kudra: not dictionary.com) Re: New types of links

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: (kudra: not dictionary.com) Re: New types of links
by kael (Monk) on Jun 20, 2002 at 02:39 UTC
    1. Allows l33t style spelling
    not seeing how the decreases the value of the dictionary. if it only accepted l33t style spelling you'd have a point.
    2. Really just takes a lot of other people's definitions, including those in the jargon file, which isn't how a dictionary is usually compiled
    True but not seeing how this is a bad thing. you get multiple definitions instead of just one.
    3. Includes value judgements on subject matter
    this seems to be quite rare though. and the definition was valid... I would agree it was out of place but not THAT big a deal. It wasn't even a value judgement but a statement of fact, piracy IS illegal.
    oh well i don't really see this issue as all that important. move to a diffrent dictionary if that what people prefere, who really cares?