Re: Re: Ispell path for W2K

(oops...) I did forget that, (my bad) ++ for the catch. Thanks for reminding me of the simple fixes first though. I should have known better.

However, it had no effect on the problem... any other ideas?

- Mission

Comment on Re: Re: Ispell path for W2K

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Ispell path for W2K by dda (Friar) on Jun 19, 2002 at 09:41 UTC
Strange thing. I downloaded Ispell and perl module, installed everything on my W2K, and it doesn't work under Apache too. But it doesn't complain about a path. I just can't open web page with test script! Looks like Apache is unable to run a script that forks. Unfortunately, that's all so far.. --dda P.S. Just noticed a lot of ispell.exe processes in the task manager. I think that I should reboot and repeat experiments. :(	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re: Re: Re: Ispell path for W2K
by dda (Friar) on Jun 19, 2002 at 09:41 UTC

--dda

P.S. Just noticed a lot of ispell.exe processes in the task manager. I think that I should reboot and repeat experiments. :(

[reply]