in reply to GD/gd Namespace issue

That would be confusing.

If you don't like Image::, maybe GDLib:: would do. It would still be somewhat confusing, but at least it would indicate that there are two distinctily different things there.

Makeshifts last the longest.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: GD/gd Namespace issue
by Beatnik (Parson) on Jun 22, 2002 at 17:39 UTC
    Well, I'm not sure if they will be 2 different things... I've written a very basic module and I dont plan to release anything until I have something more solid and abstract. Since I'm using gd, chances are I base some code on GD or I provide some functionality of gd itself too...
    My point being that I'm not using GD but gd and somehow it's similar :) I'll just wait how this thread evolves and hopefully release some nice stuff :)

    Greetz
    Beatnik
    ...Perl is like sex: if you're doing it wrong, there's no fun to it.
[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom