in reply to PM's notoriety in the real world

I certainly won't hope that there's any employer that's foolish enough to think Perlmonks XP system rates Perl knowledge. It does not! It rates *popularity* (not of author, but of subject). Ask a web-related not really Perl question that was asked 5 times in the previous month, get frontpaged, and you're likely to earn 100 XP. Just for asking, not for knowing. Answer a complicated question about IPC, correcting a dozen answers that were wrong, with lots of code, and you're likely to get about 5 XP.

Questions often get far more XP than answers to those questions. Answers to complicated questions usually get even less. Knowing less will actually earn you more XP, and a higher status than knowing more. Not to mention that once after you've gotten a few points, you can work up to saint by just hanging around and voting.

I'm glad my employer never asked about Perlmonks. I have been asked what my CPAN id was though.

Abigail

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: PM's notoriety in the real world
by coreolyn (Parson) on Jul 08, 2002 at 19:13 UTC
    My perlmonks 'rank' is complete proof of everything Abigail just said *g*. coreolyn
Re: Re: PM's notoriety in the real world
by Courage (Parson) on Jul 11, 2002 at 18:25 UTC
    I'm 100% agree with you and, to help you to show that situation is even worse than you just said, I have some examples of answers to a complicated question with a lot of work and corrections, which gained few XP, but, after casual mass-downvoting, their XP became negative!

    Sometimes thoughtful answer even loses few XP!

    Courage, the Cowardly Dog.