Re: Re: •Re: RFC: Class::DispatchToAll

The problem this solves is very real-world. Consider a Perl class hierarchy in which a class Child inherits from classes Mother and Father:

Uh, oh. Multiple Inheritance.

A couple of years of doing Smalltalk (which didn't have multiple inheritance, but which let you fake interface interitance via mixins), and a couple of years of Java and C++ have lead me to believe that Multiple Inheritance is a Very Risky Thing, and that it can always be worked around by either composition or reducing to inheriting from one data-bearing class and multiple (data-less) interface classes. Doing so avoids the multiple destructor problem.

Perhaps you've run into a situation where multiple inheritance is the right thing to do. If so, I'd like to hear about it.

Comment on Re: Re: •Re: RFC: Class::DispatchToAll

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: RFC: Class::DispatchToAll by Abigail-II (Bishop) on Jul 11, 2002 at 11:07 UTC
It happens often in LPC. It's a language mostly used for building MUDs. Often you will have a standard weapon class and a standard wearable class. All weapons inherit from the weapon class, while all wearables inherit from the wearable class. But boxing gloves would inherit from both. Some problems LPC has with multiple inheritance aren't found in Perl (for instance, the possibility of duplicating variables when a class is inherited by two paths - different implementations of LPC solve it differently). Other things are solved differently, for instance, one flavour of LPC forbids inheriting from two classes if they have methods with the same name - unless the inheriting class defines a method with that same name. There is nothing wrong with multiple inheritance. It's just hard to implement is right, which is way some languages take the easy way out and outright forbid it. Inheritance is already a hard problem in Perl, but multiple inheritance is a real nightmare. But that's the fault of Perl, not of multiple inheritance. Abigail	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re: RFC: Class::DispatchToAll
by Abigail-II (Bishop) on Jul 11, 2002 at 11:07 UTC

Some problems LPC has with multiple inheritance aren't found in Perl (for instance, the possibility of duplicating variables when a class is inherited by two paths - different implementations of LPC solve it differently). Other things are solved differently, for instance, one flavour of LPC forbids inheriting from two classes if they have methods with the same name - unless the inheriting class defines a method with that same name.

There is nothing wrong with multiple inheritance. It's just hard to implement is right, which is way some languages take the easy way out and outright forbid it. Inheritance is already a hard problem in Perl, but multiple inheritance is a real nightmare. But that's the fault of Perl, not of multiple inheritance.

Abigail

[reply]