in reply to Re: Re: RFC: Wider scope for HTML::TokeParser::Simple
in thread RFC: Wider scope for HTML::TokeParser::Simple
I can understand the is_tag addition, but why add all that HTML::Tagset stuff? ( it wouldn't be simple no more )
I know the AUTOLOAD has been gone, but with the numerous tags, would it be insane not to go with it (if you add that is_head is_body stuff)? Also, who's to say what's a valid tag , ie, what subset of html are you going to support (don't say whatever HTML::Tagset supports ;)?
Seeing as i'm the only who's got anything to say, I say knock yourself out, but please keep in mind my previous comments on the interface (api version v. namespace change).
|
|---|