in reply to "regular expressions" need a new name

Perl's regexes have rarely been "reg". I heard someone (chip?) call them irregexes. I have no problem calling them regexes, though. With the number of languages working with PCREs (Perl-compatible regular expressions), our regexes might become the standard someday.

But Perl 6's regexes make me think more of grammars than patterns.

_____________________________________________________
Jeff[japhy]Pinyan: Perl, regex, and perl hacker, who'd like a job (NYC-area)
s++=END;++y(;-P)}y js++=;shajsj<++y(p-q)}?print:??;

  • Comment on Re: "regular expressions" need a new name

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: "regular expressions" need a new name
by theorbtwo (Prior) on Jul 16, 2002 at 03:27 UTC

    Ahh... but the entire point of Apoc 5 is to make them more regular -- in the "not irregular" sense, anyway. I vote "EREML" (pronounced like dremel) for the new programming language. (If you think in terms of expressions, you're missing the (OK, a) point of a5.


    Confession: It does an Immortal Body good.