in reply to Re: Re: Re: Are array based objects fixed length?
in thread Are array based objects fixed length?

Ah... the problem is that the client classes we can currently deal with don't include some classes that I want to deal with. And we haven't yet come up with a 'hook API' to allow more complicated classes to be persisted, so we can't stop yet.

As for the distinction between development tools and 'everything else', well, in a very meaningful sense Pixie is a development tool in that it will allow the average developer to make her objects persistent with almost no work. If that's not development support I don't know what it is. And check out the implementation of tools like SmartRefStream in your local Smalltalk image; there's an object persistence system that indulges in some serious voodoo.

  • Comment on Re: Re: Re: Re: Are array based objects fixed length?