Re: OO semantics quandary

Okay I have a preexisting class Foo::Bar. I am adding some new thingy that does not inherit from Foo::Bar, but is related, so how do I name it?

Depending on how it's related, how about Foo::Quux?

I'm confused about the remaining alternative you list. It seems like you're dealing with some constraints (real or imagined) that aren't shown.

Comment on Re: OO semantics quandary

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: OO semantics quandary by belg4mit (Prior) on Aug 14, 2002 at 20:03 UTC
The entire lists consists of possible naming alternatives, and the consequences/drawback/bonuses I envisage for each. Everything is in fact shown... well except one thing, see my (forthcoming) reply to smalhotra. `-- perl -pew "s/\b;([mnst])/'$1/g"`	[reply]