Re: OO semantics quandary

Your first example seems the most natural to me. Remember, package names are about organization, not about inheritance.

As for whether to rename your existing class, only you can decide whether the value of the refactoring outweighs the value of legacy support.

Comment on Re: OO semantics quandary

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: OO semantics quandary by belg4mit (Prior) on Aug 14, 2002 at 20:15 UTC
Yes, it was my initial inclination, and then I started thinking... `-- perl -pew "s/\b;([mnst])/'$1/g"`	[reply]