in reply to Re: Confirmation of sent/read mail
in thread Confirmation of sent/read mail

Ok, that is a good point, in the fight against spam, I'm glad you haven't detailed a solution. I didn't actually want confirmation advice for any evil purpose, but there are some reports that are sent out to employees where a confirmation is required. If I can't find anything out on the web, then I'll have to make do with a "please reply to this email" on the bottom of the email!

Alex

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Confirmation of sent/read mail
by theorbtwo (Prior) on Aug 30, 2002 at 07:07 UTC

    A couple of things, Alex:

    • If you're in an environment where the MUA (and it's config, in many cases) is a matter of compony policy, you're probably OK relying on MUA confirmations. If the people at the co. have any choice in the matter, I wouldn't rely on them soely, if at all. Provide some other way to say "I've read this".
    • It's easy to get a message flagged as "read" in your MUA accidently; this would normaly send a return recipt. For example, in outlook, all you need to do is delete the prior mail and walk away. After a message has been previewed for a certian amount of time (configurable), it's considered read, even if the user wasn't actualy there. The machine has no way to tell if it's seat is occupied.
    • If there's a legal reason behind the confirmation requirement, this won't fill it.
    • Why not get an account here and stay a while?
    Update: I can't spell. Thanks, dws.


    Confession: It does an Immortal Body good.