jens has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:
#!/usr/bin/perl -w use strict; use Test::More tests => 8; use Date::ICal; my $ical = Date::ICal->new( year => 1964, month => 10, day => 6, hour => 6, min => 12, sec => 47, tz => '0530' ); ok( defined $ical, 'new() returned something' ); ok( $ical->isa('Date::ICal'), " and it's the right class" ); is( $ical->sec , 47, ' sec()' ); is( $ical->min , 12, ' min()' ); is( $ical->hour , 16, ' hour()' ); is( $ical->day , 16, ' day()' ); is( $ical->month , 10, ' month()' ); is( $ical->year , 1964, ' year()' );
How is Test::More coming up with these values? (or is it correctly indicating a bug in Date::Ical?)[jens@dhcp32 jens]$ perl testmore.pl 1..8 ok 1 - new() returned something ok 2 - and it's the right class ok 3 - sec() ok 4 - min() not ok 5 - hour() # Failed test (testmore.pl at line 20) # got: '20' # expected: '16' not ok 6 - day() # Failed test (testmore.pl at line 21) # got: '5' # expected: '16' ok 7 - month() ok 8 - year() # Looks like you failed 2 tests of 8.
Can anyone else verify this bug? Obviously this is a bug in the docco Test::Tutorial. But is it a bug in Test::More or in Date::Ical? (or have I done something weird?)not ok 5 - hour() # Failed test (testmore.pl at line 20) # got: '6' # expected: '16'
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Test::More bug?
by chromatic (Archbishop) on Aug 30, 2002 at 18:14 UTC | |
|
Re: Test::More bug?
by danichka (Hermit) on Aug 30, 2002 at 05:45 UTC | |
by jens (Pilgrim) on Aug 30, 2002 at 06:05 UTC | |
by danichka (Hermit) on Aug 30, 2002 at 15:37 UTC | |
|
Re: Test::More bug?
by projekt21 (Friar) on Aug 30, 2002 at 17:08 UTC |