foreach($i=0; $i<$max; $i++){...};
[download]

Ok, that's synonymous. Yet, unless I got something completely wrong (then please correct me), constructs like

for($i=0; $i < @array; $i++){ print $array[$i]++ }; 
# Thanks for the dollar, jeffa ;)
[download]


and
foreach(@array){ print $_++;  };

do something different internally. Of course, the second is generally the better/faster approach (unless you don't need $i for something else in the loop, since $i is an unnecessary artificial variable in the first example)).

So long,
Flexx

It's really quite simple - for and foreach are the same. When you don't care about the value of the current index, don't use it:

@array = ('a'..'z');
print $_,$/ for @array;
[download]

When you do care about the value of the current index, do use it:

printf "%02d: %s\n", $_+1, $array[$_] for 0..$#array;
[download]

When in doubt, check with Deparse.pm:

$ perl -MO=Deparse foo.pl
@array = ('a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f', 'g', 'h', 'i', 'j',
'k', 'l', 'm', 'n', 'o', 'p', 'q', 'r', 's', 't', 'u', 'v', 
'w', 'x', 'y', 'z');
foreach $_ (@array) {
    print $_, $/;
}
foreach $_ (0 .. $#array) {
    printf "%02d: %s\n", $_ + 1, $array[$_];
}
foo.pl syntax OK
[download]

jeffa

L-LL-L--L-LL-L--L-LL-L--
-R--R-RR-R--R-RR-R--R-RR
B--B--B--B--B--B--B--B--
H---H---H---H---H---H---
(the triplet paradiddle with high-hat)