in reply to OT: Web Design - Catering to Everyone

I don't want to sound like one of these luddite users who are making your life difficult, but looking at the site I think I can understand why they're upset. You seem to be causing a lot of trouble for older browsers in order to do that trick where you update part of the page without actually reloading. I can't see how this is worth it, when just going to a new URL with the content showing would work just as well. In fact you're breaking common features of every browser, like bookmarks and mailing URLs to people (there is no way to mail someone a link to your "alumni & friends" page, for example).

A text version of a site is always welcome, but the one you provide here isn't very useable. Why is this all on one page? Why isn't it split into multiple URLs? It may be a bit harder, but it would make much more sense.

Have you noticed that all of the most successful sites work in older browsers? These fancy so-called "DHTML" features just don't add that much value and they shut out some of your users. I don't think they're worth it.

  • Comment on Re: OT: Web Design - Catering to Everyone

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: OT: Web Design - Catering to Everyone
by Hero Zzyzzx (Curate) on Sep 14, 2002 at 05:13 UTC

    Hear Hear!

    What elements on this page are so important that you HAD to create it so it wouldn't work in NN4.x? I'm just not seeing it, but I guess I always think functionality first, form second. Why aren't your text links underlined? All the usability studies show that the first thing folks look for when scanning a page is underlined text.

    Great job, but I'm curious as to what was so ornerous about getting this page to work mostly correct in NN4.x. . .

    Oh, and great use of accesskey attributes- I LOVE those freekin' things!

    -Any sufficiently advanced technology is
    indistinguishable from doubletalk.