Re^2: if-else vs. tertiary effieciency?

in reply to Re: if-else vs. tertiary effieciency?
in thread if-else vs. tertiary effieciency?

btw. it's a 'trinary' operator.

If you correct someone's vocabulary, please do it right. :-) The term is ternary.

Makeshifts last the longest.

Comment on Re^2: if-else vs. tertiary effieciency?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re^2: if-else vs. tertiary effieciency? by MrNobo1024 (Hermit) on Sep 14, 2002 at 15:51 UTC
Actually, either "Ternary" or "Trinary" is acceptable. --MrNobo1024 `s]]HrLfbfe\|EbBibmv]e\|s}w}ciZx^RYhL}e^print`	[reply]
Re^4: if-else vs. tertiary effieciency? by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Sep 14, 2002 at 15:59 UTC
Huh - ya learn something new every day. Thanks. Makeshifts last the longest.	[reply]
Re: Re^2: if-else vs. tertiary effieciency? by fruiture (Curate) on Sep 14, 2002 at 15:23 UTC
I'm sinking into the ground... thanks (must have come from the german "trinär") -- http://fruiture.de	[reply]
Re: Re: Re^2: if-else vs. tertiary effieciency? by kabel (Chaplain) on Sep 14, 2002 at 19:11 UTC
this actually is called "ternär" in the german language :) now stop this "erbsenzählerei" ;)	[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom