Re: Re: Re: Developing a Suite of CGI applications

I guess the modularisation thing is an agree to disagree thing.. :-)

One thing I personally hate doing is finding I like a feature in a "standard" bit of code, then having to update it in different places...

One good part about OO, is you can keep the interface the same to you module, but change the guts of it in anyway you like.

Comment on Re: Re: Re: Developing a Suite of CGI applications

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Developing a Suite of CGI applications by jordanh (Chaplain) on Sep 15, 2002 at 19:35 UTC
One good part about OO, is you can keep the interface the same to you module, but change the guts of it in anyway you like. This is a very interesting point. I'm already pretty sure I've got some routines that will be fairly consistently reused across applications. I could modularize these and if I am tempted to change, I could specialize the method for the one application without breaking anything else.	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Developing a Suite of CGI applications
by jordanh (Chaplain) on Sep 15, 2002 at 19:35 UTC

One good part about OO, is you can keep the interface the same to you module, but change the guts of it in anyway you like.

This is a very interesting point. I'm already pretty sure I've got some routines that will be fairly consistently reused across applications. I could modularize these and if I am tempted to change, I could specialize the method for the one application without breaking anything else.

[reply]