in reply to Re: Re: Re: Re: Flexible Database Updates
in thread Flexible Database Updates
imagine a world where 'Cop Killer' was removed from the CD.
I can imagine that, it wrecks your argument because we were
talking about fixed size arrays.
That your data structures need to support the requirements of
your business rules is true. But that is not an argument against
embedding arrays in a record, it would depend on the business rules.
I haven't recommended putting a fixed size array into a field.
I have suggested putting it into a set of fields. As an example:
On the Perl side I have found an array to be the best representationcreate table acct_year ( -- G/L balances for a year gl_acct varchar, year int, bal_0 numeric(12,4), -- ending balances for qtrs bal_1 numeric(12,4), bal_2 numeric(12,4), bal_3 numeric(12,4) );
my $acct_year = { gl_acct => '100', year => 2000, bal => [ 9100.03, 783.87, 6339.26, 12.06 ], };
|
|---|