in reply to OT--Define enterprise please?
It isn't at all surprising that IBM and Microsoft would "reject" MySQL. They're competitors, after all. Expect them to throw up a lot of FUD about MySQL. That said, they do have some valid points: The bigger players have a better transaction and data integrity story, though MySQL is (slowly) catching up.
A truth that IBM and Microsoft would prefer to ignore, though, is that many applications don't need a heavy-duty, full featured RDBMS. A really fast, fairly reliable data access method with SQL support is sufficient for a lot of applications (such as much of what Yahoo does, or discussion boards, or...). For a fairly large set of problems, MySQL is good enough.
|
---|