in reply to Re: Performance v's Maintainability
in thread Performance v's Maintainability

Yeah, good call. What we've done (literally) is write a module that inherits all of CGI::Application's methods, (use base), then adds a few extra accessor methods its self. The .pm application you then would write in a standard C::A way uses our abstraction rather then C::A.

So I guess in a way we have that abstraction layer Aristotle mentioned.. It does however feel messy to pass around objects, when, in purity I feel each module should survive stand-alone.

I wonder if there is something i'm just not getting..

  • Comment on Re: Re: Performance v's Maintainability