in reply to •Re: OO or just OOps ?
in thread OO or just OOps ?

I am sorry but I don't understand the first statement. I know I am (much) less experienced then you but I thought people often encapsulate data in objects and use accessor methods to get at the data. The accessor methods provide verifcation of data structure over and above what the use of datatypes can provide.

With all due respect,

--blm--

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: •Re: OO or just OOps ?
by Anonymous Monk on Sep 24, 2002 at 02:30 UTC
    That would be "procedural programming with objects".

    You can find much better approaches out there. (Yeah, it is in Java. Take good advice where you find it.)