I find your other point difficult to swallow. It sounds like conventional
wisdom but is not.

Correctness, is good. But hiding where a routine was called from is not correct.

Why lie about a code trace?!

Correct would be to do a two-step dance: have your routine
use caller and have AUTOLOAD use it too.

It may be just "cargo cult".

perlsub says "most" routines would do it, but you don't "have" to.

from perlsub:

 Most AUTOLOAD routines will load in a definition for
 the subroutine in question using eval, and then execute
 that subroutine using a special form of ``goto'' that
 erases the stack frame of the AUTOLOAD routine without a
 trace.
[download]

note: I did think it was a performance issue - it is not.

Correctness, is good. But hiding where a routine was called from is not correct.

It may be, for certain values of "correct" :-)

If I autoload methods that log (as an example of use of) caller() information, I would not like seeing in my logs:

My::Lazy::method called from My::Lazy::AUTOLOAD
[... later ...]
My::Lazy::method called from Some::Other::method
[... and ...]
My::Lazy::method called from Yet::Another::method
[download]

While correct, in a sense of the word, the information given in the first of these lines is not useful. And I don't want to make AUTOLOAD smart enough to know what to do with caller information in every case. That would defeat the purpose of AUTOLOAD. And so, I use goto instead.

With goto, I get the caller information I would get if I were not using AUTOLOAD.

If your correctness criterion is that the sub should behave as if it was already in existence, and not autoloaded, then goto provides that correctness.

The Sidhekin
print "Just another Perl ${\(trickster and hacker)},"

Your argument seems weak because AUTOLOAD will be smart
enough to make the routine, but too stupid to know whether
to use caller itself.


If this is debugging info there is no reason to avoid logging
the AUTOLOAD call also. If it is not debugging info, I
don't see a reason to expose implementation details to
users.

I agree with The Sidhekin that correctness is an amorphous thing.