Re: Re: chatterbox causes heavy load? So why don't switch to IRC?

in reply to Re: chatterbox causes heavy load? So why don't switch to IRC?
in thread chatterbox causes heavy load? So why don't switch to IRC?

I don't know what the support for iframes is like now but you could make it an optional user setting. I bet you would still lighten a lot of load.

-Lee

"To be civilized is to deny one's nature."

Comment on Re: Re: chatterbox causes heavy load? So why don't switch to IRC?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: chatterbox causes heavy load? So why don't switch to IRC? by joe++ (Friar) on Sep 30, 2002 at 12:22 UTC
IFRAME is part of canonical HTML since 4.0 and supported by MSIE and Mozilla for years. Shouldn't be much of a problem methinks! Added bonus: the main page loads independent of the scatterbox stuff, which could improve the overall (subjective) experience. ++BrowserUk. -- Cheers, Joe	[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion