in reply to Re: reg exp
in thread reg exp
No you got that right. Be unsure no longer. The named POSIX classes are nice for keeping things clear especially when you consider character sets and Unicode. [A-Za-z0-9_] is sufficient for US-ASCII but it's wordy and easier to mistype than [:alphanum:]. The nice thing is that if you start moving beyond US-ASCII then you've already taken care of some of th work up front. It's also more in line with what I gather will be the expected idiom for perl6. The idea here is that it is infeasable for you to actually specify what is a "word" character for whatever character set you're using in your regular expression.
|
|---|