in reply to CPAN authors, clean up your directories

A slightly different problem is that a lot of CPAN stuff is old and unmaintained without being particularly useful, but occupying a namespace that means that newer better stuff has to be named stupid things.

Id really like to see a way that an unmaintained modules namespace somehow gets "released" to another more diligent maintainer, perhaps after onyl committing to maintian the present interface for some amount of time.

--- demerphq
my friends call me, usually because I'm late....

  • Comment on Re: CPAN authors, clean up your directories

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: CPAN authors, clean up your directories
by John M. Dlugosz (Monsignor) on Oct 14, 2002 at 20:57 UTC
    I suppose if there was Foo::Bar version 0.8 that's been gathering dust since 1994, and you really wanted that namespace Foo::Bar for yourself, you could simply release Foo::Bar 1.0 that happens to be totally different from the old 0.8.
[reply]
      Thats possible?

      I had for some reason assumed that things that like were prohibited.

      Interesting idea, I guess i'd have to speak with the CPAN people to find out what the details of doing such a thing would be.

      --- demerphq
      my friends call me, usually because I'm late....

[reply]
        Let us know, would you?

        Perhaps using a higher version number will be part of the process to "reclaim" a retired name space, as that keeps automated tools happy.

[reply]

In Section Meditations