Anonymous Monk has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:
It was an unqualified statement, but it got me thinking, why is that (or is it even accurate)??
I can't find any resources on this - not that it's vital, but it has an impact if you want to compile modules, you don't have vc++, and you do have mingw (need to compile modules using the same compiler you used to compile perl). I know there's a way around this using ExtUtils::FakeConfig, but why bother if mingw works just fine for the original perl compile as well??
I think I read ActiveState uses VC++, but beyond that, haven't come across anything...
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Compiling perl (interpreter) on win32 - mingw vs. VC++
by chromatic (Archbishop) on Oct 23, 2002 at 23:36 UTC |