in reply to RE: RE: Re: DBI vs MLDBM/GDBM_File
in thread DBI vs MLDBM/GDBM_File, etc.

It's partly because I don't want to muck with a server, but mostly because it's a system administration tool, and I don't want people to need a running DB server to use it. In this sense it's a design decision, I guess.

--ZZamboni

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: DBI vs MLDBM/GDBM_File
by KM (Priest) on Jul 03, 2000 at 23:51 UTC
    Ah, gotcha. There would only really be one DB server needed, you would just need the DB client running on the machines which need access. So, DBD::RAM or the like would be good to look into.

    Cheers,
    KM