in reply to removing POD docs from modules

I wrote Pod::Stripper to do just that, strip pod.

Here's a tip on searching CPAN, look for all distributions containing your subject (like this).

update:
I did a little test, took my perl5.8, and removed all html/pod files, and stripped pod out of every .pm, and my perl directory went from about 40mb to about 18mb. None of the modules broke as far as I know , and I ran a few test ( although some heredocs might be missing ;D )

____________________________________________________
** The Third rule of perl club is a statement of fact: pod is sexy.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: removing POD docs from modules
by joe++ (Friar) on Oct 31, 2002 at 16:49 UTC
    Cool, as an act of pure conceptual art.

    However, I wouldn't want to do any work on your system where perldoc Any::Module returns just No documentation found for "Any::Module".

    BTW, how many cents worth of storage did you save? Less than one (non-free) beer I bet. Unless you're preparing embedded perl for the next-gen chipcards, in which case I'm utterly impressed!

    --
    Cheers Joe ;-)

      However, I wouldn't want to do any work on your system where perldoc Any::Module returns just No documentation found for "Any::Module".
      Then put the stripped POD into a .pod file. In other words: put what you extract from Any/Module.pm into a file Any/Module.pod. It works just as dandy with perldoc.
        Just wondering if there is any reason to separate POD from Perl source, apart from saving space? My initial reaction whas somewhat ironic, as I didn't see any reason for wanting to do so. But the reply from bart makes me wonder if there is any significant performance penalty at compile time if Perl has to wade through lots of POD sections?

        I can't hardly imagine that a performance gain from stripping POD is significant, but has this been tested by anyone? Just wondering...

        --
        Cheers, Joe

Re: Re: removing POD docs from modules
by Anonymous Monk on Oct 31, 2002 at 14:56 UTC
    Cool, thanks. Actually I did that exact search on CPAN already, and I remember looking at that page, but I guess I missed that reference at the bottom ;) My bad...