Re: Re: stack-frame-substituting subs indirectly?

Wow, I didn't know that Perl had a goto funtion. ... Something to abuse. :)

When I've learned how to use it correctly. :(

Comment on Re: Re: stack-frame-substituting subs indirectly?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: stack-frame-substituting subs indirectly? by particle (Vicar) on Nov 05, 2002 at 13:56 UTC
see Would you use 'goto' here? for one of the best discussions related to goto on this site, before you cause too much trouble ;) ~Particle accelerates	[reply] [d/l]
Re^4: stack-frame-substituting subs indirectly? by Louis_Wu (Chaplain) on Nov 05, 2002 at 20:12 UTC
Thanks for the link. I'm still learning pigdin Perl, so I'll put that link in my "round tuit" file. Maybe on my userpage. :)	[reply]