in reply to Computer Education in Public Schools

Before I'd embark on a computer education for a child, I would first teach them Chess. And no, it doesn't matter if they are a boy or a girl, Chess is not gender specific except by 'nurture'. The idea here is that game playing is already a 'child' activity---as it should be. Chess is just an extension of what they already are doing, only 'more so' so to speak. If they can handle the ideas inherent in strategy and tactics, then they should have no trouble with programming.

Assuming a positive outcome, I'd next grab one of the many Logo primers from MIT and then help them pan through it. If this works out, next I'd back the hell off and let the 'tree' grow how ever the hell it wants to---just getting started is enough!

--hsm

"Never try to teach a pig to sing...it wastes your time and it annoys the pig."
  • Comment on Re: Computer Education in Public Schools

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Computer Education in Public Schools
by Jenda (Abbot) on Nov 07, 2002 at 18:16 UTC

    I've never been god at Chess. Too many pieces with too many options. And it takes ages to get anywhere.

    What I did love was Merkur, "fake" Lego and other similar things. I did not spend time with toy cars, I built them. I did not waste my time with toy trains, I built towns and tracks for them.

    And I think I did learn something there. Besides aren't we all putting prebuilt pieces together? ;-)

    Jenda