in reply to Nomenclature: names for roles

I agree, it is a good idea to select some names and stick to them. It makes it easier to write documents and reduces confusion. I would suggests that the most important step is deciding to use specific names, which names you actually pick are unimportant (so long as everyone knows what you mean)

In one of my software systems we refer to:

It sounds like your system won't quite match but this suits our way of working.

Another trick I have seen (but don't use myself) is to always mark out the name (say in italics) to remind readers that you are talking about a specific role when you use the name.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Nomenclature: names for roles
by John M. Dlugosz (Monsignor) on Nov 07, 2002 at 17:17 UTC
    Hmm, in Cryptography, the names Alice, Bob, etc. are used. You set up the situation, and then use the names instead of "the sender" etc.

    Without good succinct roll names, perhaps a sentence to introduce and explain the role of each Proper Name would make for a clear document.