in reply to Re: RFC: Template::YetAnother
in thread RFC: Template::YetAnother

*ugh* No... We don't need any more top-level names. Especially anything as arrogant as "Just". If domm *does* proceed there are two current naming conventions which would be more appropriate to follow, Template::Simple or Template::Lite (UPDATE: Template::Minimal even, though AFAIK CGI::Minimal is the only member of that set)

--
I'm not belgian but I play one on TV.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: RFC: Template::YetAnother
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Nov 16, 2002 at 22:10 UTC

    Quite why you associate the word "just" with arrogance escapes me.

    Okay you lot, get your wings on the left, halos on the right. It's one size fits all, and "No!", you can't have a different color.
    Pick up your cloud down the end and "Yes" if you get allocated a grey one they are a bit damp under foot, but someone has to get them.
    Get used to the wings fast cos its an 8 hour day...unless the Govenor calls for a cyclone or hurricane, in which case 16 hour shifts are mandatory.
    Just be grateful that you arrived just as the tornado season finished. Them buggers are real work.

[reply]
      arrogance isn't quite the right word, but it was the best fit I could think of at the time. perhaps pretentious is better.

      UPDATE: Just::Template => Pure::Template. Now calling your module Pure::Template, unless it's a template system for some system or software package called pure, is somewhat inflammatory and speaking unnecessary ill of other Template modules. Finally, putting it in something other than Template:: almost certainly qualifies as being "hidden in very strange namespaces", something domm scorned other modules for being.

      --
      I'm not belgian but I play one on TV.

[reply]

In Section Meditations