Re: Re: Re: RFC: Template::YetAnother

Makes sense. And I withdraw the (originally somewhat lighthearted) suggestion.

However, there are many modules that sit in one namespace, but could equally well sit in several namespaces. The obvious example is CGI.pm. Belg4mit has ~~just~~:^) recently pointed out CGI::Minimal which I hadn't encountered and maybe Template::Minimal is a better choice.

My thought was that I would appreciate a top level space where there were modules that did exactly one thing and nothing more. Within that they could be categorised in the normal way.

Oh well. T'was j..er.. only a thought.

Okay you lot, get your wings on the left, halos on the right. It's one size fits all, and "No!", you can't have a different color.
Pick up your cloud down the end and "Yes" if you get allocated a grey one they are a bit damp under foot, but someone has to get them.
Get used to the wings fast cos its an 8 hour day...unless the Govenor calls for a cyclone or hurricane, in which case 16 hour shifts are mandatory.
Just be grateful that you arrived just as the tornado season finished. Them buggers are real work.

Comment on Re: Re: Re: RFC: Template::YetAnother Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: RFC: Template::YetAnother by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Nov 16, 2002 at 23:16 UTC
CPAN has a search engine - it's not hard to look for ::Simple and ::Easy. :) Remember also that what you consider "just one thing" maybe less than one thing to someone else and maybe still too much to yet another person. Makeshifts last the longest.	[reply]