in reply to Re: Re: Extra strict subs
in thread Extra strict subs

Sounds like it'll work. It'd be nice, however, to be able to say use strict; no strict 'super-subs'; or somthing to get existing use strict 'subs' behivor, but not the new behavor.


Warning: Unless otherwise stated, code is untested. Do not use without understanding. Code is posted in the hopes it is useful, but without warranty. All copyrights are relinquished into the public domain unless otherwise stated. I am not an angel. I am capable of error, and err on a fairly regular basis. If I made a mistake, please let me know (such as by replying to this node).

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Extra strict subs
by Elian (Parson) on Nov 27, 2002 at 03:41 UTC
    You won't have to--as I said, while we may co-opt some of the underlying mechanisms, it won't affect normal stricture in any way. It'll look and act separately from stricture. (Don't worry, beefing up strict at this point would be rather a bad thing, which I do realize :)