in reply to Re: Re^8: NO PERL 6
in thread NO PERL 6
Ball's in your court again. :-) The obvious problem here is certainly easy to fix by stricter syntax, but in thinking about the fix I've already found a few more ambiguities..sub BITS () { 16 } my $x = 100 <<BITS;
Makeshifts last the longest.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re^10: NO PERL 6
by jryan (Vicar) on Dec 10, 2002 at 21:34 UTC | |
by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Dec 11, 2002 at 09:17 UTC | |
by jryan (Vicar) on Dec 11, 2002 at 19:58 UTC |