in reply to Re^4: A different OO approach
in thread A different OO approach

I very much agree with "once and only once", my origins as a programmer were steeped in Asm and C. I realized quickly how it sucked cutting and pasting code (or making changes), then hunting down all the errors I cut and pasted. But on the other hand, I do a lot of CGI and including a dozen odd modules (and there includes) can quickly kill response time. (mod_perl isn't always an option.)

I'm not advocating people not use modules, but for myself, when it is something like this, were it amounts to a a few lines of code, I tend to keep it in a snippet file and cut and paste it into the source. In the simplest form.. 
sub add   {
    my ($self,$name,$value) = @_;
    return if $name !~/^\w+$/;
    my $pack = ref $self;
    no strict 'refs';
    *{$pack.'::'.$name} = sub : lvalue { $Attrs{+shift}->{$name} };
}

[download]
seems extreme for a module. On the other hand, if your attributes are more complex it could easily become worthy of using a module.

And yes I was confusing you with the poster, my bad.

-Lee

"To be civilized is to deny one's nature."

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: A different OO approach
by adrianh (Chancellor) on Dec 15, 2002 at 23:08 UTC
    In the simplest form...seems extreme for a module.

    I'm afraid I'm the sort of weirdo who will write a module for a one-liner if it means I don't have to type it twice. I'll then code something to inline it automatically if efficiency proves to be an issue :-)

    On the other hand, if your attributes are more complex it could easily become worthy of using a module.

    It's not that they're more complex, it's that when I refactor code they tend to move around a fair bit between classes. Since I change them a lot, forgetting to tweak a DESTROY method or update a list of attributes is exactly what I'm likely to do. It's an artifact of my development style.

[reply]
      I'm the sort of weirdo who will write a module for a one-liner if it means I don't have to type it twice. I'll then code something to inline it automatically if efficiency proves to be an issue :-)
      Heh, I was thinking just that while I was reading shotgunefx's post. That makes two of us I guess. :)

      Makeshifts last the longest.

[reply]

In Section Meditations