in reply to Re: Re: Wx::Carp - a replacement for Carp in Wx applications
in thread Wx::Carp - a replacement for Carp in Wx applications

Ok, I think I get it now. You call Carp and pipe the output through Wx::LogFatalError or ::LogWarning; and that's what you get when you use Wx::Carp and then call carp "foo!" later.

Am I right?

$ echo '$0 & $0 &' > foo; chmod a+x foo; foo;

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Wx::Carp - a replacement for Carp in Wx applications
by PodMaster (Abbot) on Dec 26, 2002 at 06:02 UTC
    Pretty much, except no piping is done ;)(argument passing)


    MJD says you can't just make shit up and expect the computer to know what you mean, retardo!
    ** The Third rule of perl club is a statement of fact: pod is sexy.