in reply to Re: Understanding someone else's parser
in thread Understanding someone else's parser
I also recall japhy noting that the base module doesn't yet support all the really funky things[1] you can do with regexen. It's really a string parser and in general parsing regexes also reduces to requiring a Perl parser in Perl that isn't perl.
[1] - my definition of funky starts at (?{}) / (??{}) so maybe it's good for everything normal programmers use. ;-)
Fun Fun Fun in the Fluffy Chair
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re^2: Understanding someone else's parser
by John M. Dlugosz (Monsignor) on Jan 02, 2003 at 08:11 UTC | |
by diotalevi (Canon) on Jan 03, 2003 at 00:07 UTC |