Re: (jeffa) Re: require() turns off strict?

#define PEDANTIC_MODE 1

use strict only works in the current package

I think you meant to say "use strict only works in the current lexical scope" which is slightly different from the current package. It could be that the two files had stuff from the same package (eg the main one).

Update: Sorry I see that you have corrected that while I wasn't paying attention

Comment on Re: (jeffa) Re: require() turns off strict?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: (jeffa) Re: require() turns off strict? by broquaint (Abbot) on Jan 06, 2003 at 14:48 UTC
`#ifdef PEDANTIC_MODE # include <limits.h> # define PEDANTIC_MODE INT_MAX #endif` [download] I think you meant to say "use strict only works in the current lexical scope" which is slightly different from the current package Nope, the current package holds for the length of the current lexical scope^[1], which is usually the file-level lexical scope. See the docs for more info. HTH `_________ broquaint` ^[1] although the 5.005 docs say it is dynamically scoped but I'm pretty sure it's lexically scoped because it takes effect at compile-time which isn't orthogonal with dynamically scoping	[reply] [d/l]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re: Re: (jeffa) Re: require() turns off strict?
by broquaint (Abbot) on Jan 06, 2003 at 14:48 UTC

#ifdef PEDANTIC_MODE

#  include <limits.h>
#  define PEDANTIC_MODE INT_MAX

#endif
[download]

I think you meant to say "use strict only works in the current lexical scope" which is slightly different from the current package

^[1]

the docs

_________ broquaint

^[1] although the 5.005 docs say it is dynamically scoped but I'm pretty sure it's lexically scoped because it takes effect at compile-time which isn't orthogonal with dynamically scoping

[reply]
[d/l]