Re: JAPH with constraints

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: JAPH with constraints by locked_user mtve (Deacon) on Jan 05, 2003 at 08:36 UTC
Uhm, sorry. It was me :) (49) `die$;!~y//.-~/c.$;.([$^=~/./g]&~$").$&.($;&{}).$/` 69 for truly EBCDIC: `[]=~/./;$;=$_=$&;$;++for$^F..ord$/;die$;.$_.$&x$^=~/.$/.{}!~/./.$&.$/`
Re: Re: Re: JAPH with constraints by behroozi (Beadle) on Jan 05, 2003 at 14:43 UTC
The first one is very nice! However, the second one contains the variable $^F, which is not allowed by the constraints.	[reply]
Re: Re: Re: Re: JAPH with constraints by locked_user mtve (Deacon) on Jan 05, 2003 at 19:01 UTC
Well, that ^F can be hardcoded (, "\006") :) But ok, it isn't (67): `[]=~/./;$;=$_=$&;$;++for$^=~/.$/..~-ord$/;die$;.$_.$&.{}!~/./.$&.$/` Also, "~" in your solution probably should be "\\" because "~" in EBCDIC is lower than alphanumerics. It's very interesting what're other ways to get "J" under such constraints. I found only ">" and "?" pair that is on the same distance (1) in both tables, so maybe "K" can be transliterated to "J".
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: JAPH with constraints by behroozi (Beadle) on Jan 05, 2003 at 19:44 UTC
Re: Re: JAPH with constraints by Bobinours (Acolyte) on Jan 13, 2003 at 08:12 UTC
This one is "use strict" and -w flag compliant. Great ! ++	[reply]