Re: DB_File utility

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
(jeffa) 2Re: DB_File utility by jeffa (Bishop) on Jan 05, 2003 at 17:19 UTC
For that matter, why not just use SQLite with Matts's DBD::SQLite? Should you need to convert to an RDBM later, all you should need to do (after the data has been migrated) is change drivers. jeffa L-LL-L--L-LL-L--L-LL-L-- -R--R-RR-R--R-RR-R--R-RR B--B--B--B--B--B--B--B-- H---H---H---H---H---H--- (the triplet paradiddle with high-hat)	[reply]
Re^3: DB_File utility by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Jan 05, 2003 at 23:40 UTC
And using Tie::DBI, we come around full circle to code that doesn't even need to change all that much even though initially written for DB_File. `:)` Makeshifts last the longest.	[reply]
Re^4: DB_File utility by diotalevi (Canon) on Jan 06, 2003 at 00:22 UTC
Though having taken a look at Tie::DBI's code... I wouldn't recommend it. I don't recall why but my general recollection was not positive. It was something about the algorithmic quality. Fun Fun Fun in the Fluffy Chair	[reply]