Re: Re: No of processors

I have said this wrong !!! my fault I meant to say number of *cpu's* not processes

Comment on Re: Re: No of processors

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: No of processors by mce (Curate) on Jan 08, 2003 at 12:31 UTC
Ach, you mean Sys::CPU. Isn't CPAN wonderfull :-) --------------------------- Dr. Mark Ceulemans Senior Consultant IT Masters, Belgium	[reply]
Re: Re: Re: Re: No of processors by ropey (Hermit) on Jan 08, 2003 at 12:38 UTC
Thats the puppy - trust me I did look, obviously my searching technique needs fine tuning ++ mce	[reply]