in reply to Re^4: HELP!!!! VB code to PERL?
in thread HELP!!!! VB code to PERL?
And I think that VB-like code already looks very much like pseudo-code.
Possibly, but I have a rare disorder that results in me being unable to read VB code. If I read more than 2 lines of it I get a migraine, start convulsing, and then lose consciousness. I think it's some sort of defense mechanism.
Anyhow the LotusScript situation is even worse - the other supported languages are Java, C and C++.
C rocks, C++ sort of rocks, and Java, well, I don't mind it too much. I hope you enjoyed the preceeding enlightening, objective analysis about those languages and their respective merits.
I'm terribly disappointed in what I'm perceiving to be language bigotry elsewhere in this response tree.
There is plenty to complain about when it comes to programming languages. Some are indeed flat out better than others. Just like any other type of design, language designs can suck. Writing criticisms of these sub-par languages off as "language bigotry" is not very constructive. Flame the hell outta advocates of crappy languages instead. It's much more fun.
The root node really shouldn't have been downvoted.
Don't look at me, I can't vote. Flame the saints instead, they're all in on it together.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^6: HELP!!!! VB code to PERL?
by diotalevi (Canon) on Jan 08, 2003 at 17:51 UTC | |
by Silicon Cactus (Scribe) on Jan 09, 2003 at 21:34 UTC | |
by diotalevi (Canon) on Jan 10, 2003 at 13:24 UTC | |
|