in reply to TinyPerl 2.0 and new SF site.
It is indeed a great feat. However ....
Is it really very stable?
Quoting from your sourceforge page:
01-05-2003
TinyPerl 2.0 beta published. Now smaller, without need of the little directory ./lib and the XS of Compress::Zlib goes inside PerlLib (Perl58.dll).
TinyPerl now can create binarys for your script too! ;-P01-03-2003
TinyPerl 1.1 released.
I wonder how could you tell in two days that a package as complex as Perl, albeit tiny is stable! Aren't you going too fast?
Now, I don't know about the innards of TinyPerl, but for example it doesn't run things like the Camel code. You may say that it is not the most useful piece of code in an enterprise or that it is not a fair example, but I would investigate why this worldwide known Perl script does not run.... :)1Cheers
cchampion
1 Actually, it runs, but it doesn't print anything.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re: TinyPerl 2.0 and new SF site.
by PodMaster (Abbot) on Jan 09, 2003 at 22:33 UTC | |
by cchampion (Curate) on Jan 10, 2003 at 00:11 UTC | |
by PodMaster (Abbot) on Jan 10, 2003 at 02:41 UTC | |
|
Re: Re: TinyPerl 2.0 and new SF site.
by gmpassos (Priest) on Jan 10, 2003 at 05:29 UTC |