in reply to Re: Re: Perl Man Pages
in thread Perl Man Pages

I beg to differ. I have found that paper is far superior to perldoc. My books are highlighted, personalized, annotated, and can be used to kill spiders. Books clutter my physical desktop, but not my virtual desktop, which is far smaller. When was the last time you tried annotating an html file? Realistically, you can't do it. You'd have to start a separate text file of notes.

I won't argue that having html and perldoc for documentation isn't useful, because it is. And, true, having both the Perl Bookshelf and the Lincoln Stein CGI book in a digital form has been hugely convenient. Still, I wouldn't give up my books for anything. Sometimes, I just like to (gasp!) walk away from my PC, plunk myself down somewhere else, and read.

-Logan
"What do I want? I'm an American. I want more."

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Books still work
by brianarn (Chaplain) on Jan 14, 2003 at 22:43 UTC
    I'm of the same mind, Logan. I mean, I love having perldoc for fast stuff, and I'm also the proud owner of the Perl CD Bookshelves 1 and 2 as well as many other CD bookshelves for convenience, but I like to have hardcopy as well. It's nice to be able to read about Perl when I can't be writing it. =)

    ~Brian
Re: Books still work
by helgi (Hermit) on Jan 16, 2003 at 11:31 UTC
    I only use the dead tree books for "the reading room" nowadays.

    --
    Regards,
    Helgi Briem
    helgi AT decode DOT is