in reply to Re: for vs foreach
in thread for vs foreach

Macphisto, I didn't see your original post, but it sounds as if you simply posted something incorrect. That doesn't excuse any -- votes (and I'm giving you ++, because a wrong answer does not deserve a vote-down in SoPW).

However, let me encourage you not to simply remove your original post. There is a much better chance for others to learn something if you will just modify your post by adding an update tag, like:
Update: LSD flashbacks caused me to confuse valid Perl code with Mork and Mindy's home phone number. Here is what I should have said...

That way, you can avoid negative votes (which, again, should not happen simply for incorrect posts) for your original post, and even more negative votes for a "deleted" post.

Thanks for posting, and welcome to our community.

Russ
Brainbench 'Most Valuable Professional' for Perl

  • Comment on RE:(2) for vs foreach (-- for incorrect answer)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: RE:(2) for vs foreach (-- for incorrect answer)
by Macphisto (Hermit) on Jul 17, 2000 at 22:09 UTC
    Thanks, Russ. I appreciate the open mind. I got blasted for that post. I didn't check my code and paid for it! Ouch! The beatings will continue until morale raises.