in reply to Man's ravings? No.

While I agree with you, Russ, I think it's a matter that the author didn't make it clear that it was a runnable script. It wasn't clear to me when I first saw it, either.

For the record, this does run, and produces good output (even without -w and use strict; <G>)

--Chris

Update:It works with use strict; just fine, but fails with -w. Still, it's tre' cool.

e-mail jcwren

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: (jcwren) RE: Man's ravings? No.
by Aighearach (Initiate) on Jul 17, 2000 at 16:14 UTC
    if you couldn't tell it was code, that's about as obfuscated as you can get. He deserves a reward. Or a punishment, depending on which side of the fence you're on... 
    Paris Sinclair    |    4a75737420416e6f74686572
pariss@efn.org    |    205065726c204861636b6572
I wear my Geek Code on my finger.
[reply]

In Section Obfuscated Code